The NYTimes printed an article Cases of Unruly Airline Passengers Are Soaring, and So Are Federal Fines that suggested this dramatic rise in bad, if not overtly dangerous behaviors was in fact a result of a segment of the flying public refusing to wear a mask. The article, reprinted in its entirety below, is both true and misleading. It may appear that the disturbing increase in unruly and violent behavior from the general (overwhelmingly American) flying public stems from the refusal to wear a mask despite a plethora of written and verbal warnings that masks must be worn at all times aboard an airliner, but let's be clear here, the demand to wear a mask does not in and of itself instill violence when flying.
No nerve agent, no secret Russian cocktail, no chemical compound of any kind is emitted from facial masks that cause a percentage of human beings to suddenly go berserk, whether on a civilian airliner or at the US Capital.
Back in the early 70s, the Atlanta-based CDC was called in as a desperate measure when a small town in the Upper Midwest suddenly and inexplicably found itself under siege by a deadly assault of red ants, the likes of which could only have been imagined in a sci-fi horror flick on the silver screen. They were everywhere and people were dying.
An epidemiological team was sent in to investigate. Through a painstaking set of methodologies that included analysis of individual health and travel records, surveillance data, archival materials specific to the town and its citizenry, environmental conditions such as weather patterns, water and soil samples, and what if any new foods were introduced to the area, finally, an answer emerged...
The CDC epidemiological research and contact tracing team discovered a singular explanation; the sudden and dramatic onslaught of deadly red ants was correlated with persons holding a PhD. The only change that had occurred, the only variable, the only contiguous event for both place and time, was the large number of PhD scientists that arrived in this town at nearly the exact same time the red ants mysteriously appeared.
There was an unmistakeable, irrefutable, positive correlation between the sudden arrival of PhDs and a sudden influx of red ants. Case closed?
Was this a scientific fact? It was indeed. It was a true positive correlation in that the increase of one thing (sudden arrival of an unusual number of PhD scientists) occurred at the approximate time and in similar numbers, proportionately, as the the other thing (sudden arrival of an unusual number of red ants), and that no two other things appeared correlated. That said, we also know the old adage that Correlation does not imply Causation. What then, was the cause?
No nerve agent, no secret Russian cocktail, no chemical compound of any kind is emitted from facial masks that cause a percentage of human beings to suddenly go berserk, whether on a civilian airliner or at the US Capital.
Back in the early 70s, the Atlanta-based CDC was called in as a desperate measure when a small town in the Upper Midwest suddenly and inexplicably found itself under siege by a deadly assault of red ants, the likes of which could only have been imagined in a sci-fi horror flick on the silver screen. They were everywhere and people were dying.
An epidemiological team was sent in to investigate. Through a painstaking set of methodologies that included analysis of individual health and travel records, surveillance data, archival materials specific to the town and its citizenry, environmental conditions such as weather patterns, water and soil samples, and what if any new foods were introduced to the area, finally, an answer emerged...
The CDC epidemiological research and contact tracing team discovered a singular explanation; the sudden and dramatic onslaught of deadly red ants was correlated with persons holding a PhD. The only change that had occurred, the only variable, the only contiguous event for both place and time, was the large number of PhD scientists that arrived in this town at nearly the exact same time the red ants mysteriously appeared.
There was an unmistakeable, irrefutable, positive correlation between the sudden arrival of PhDs and a sudden influx of red ants. Case closed?
Was this a scientific fact? It was indeed. It was a true positive correlation in that the increase of one thing (sudden arrival of an unusual number of PhD scientists) occurred at the approximate time and in similar numbers, proportionately, as the the other thing (sudden arrival of an unusual number of red ants), and that no two other things appeared correlated. That said, we also know the old adage that Correlation does not imply Causation. What then, was the cause?
Cancer, and subsequently cancer research, was at an all time high. In a financially well-endowed answer to heed the call, a well-known University had just broken ground on their blueprint of a brand new high-tech (for the 70s) addition to the campus; this was to be a research facility devoted primarily to cancer research with all the latest new-fangled, high-tech medical and scientific equipment and specially-trained personnel. In anticipation, a sizable team of research scientists were recruited from all over, foreign and domestic. Each of whom had at minimum of one PhD per scientist.
In order to accommodate this first of its kind research facility, the ground had to be drilled to an unusual depth, well below what was customary. And wouldn't you know it, in the middle of the night, or at least out of sight, came this unsightly barrage of indignant marching red ants, no doubt a tad miffed that their lair was discovered and destroyed. In the short time it took to discover this invading army, they were already everywhere (both the scientists and the ants), the town was at veritable war.
While there was a positive correlation of PhDs and red ants, PhDs of course did not cause the insects to appear. And so it can be said that Covid mask wearing does not cause the flying public to suddenly lose control and behave violently. Must be some other reason. I wonder what it might be...
In order to accommodate this first of its kind research facility, the ground had to be drilled to an unusual depth, well below what was customary. And wouldn't you know it, in the middle of the night, or at least out of sight, came this unsightly barrage of indignant marching red ants, no doubt a tad miffed that their lair was discovered and destroyed. In the short time it took to discover this invading army, they were already everywhere (both the scientists and the ants), the town was at veritable war.
While there was a positive correlation of PhDs and red ants, PhDs of course did not cause the insects to appear. And so it can be said that Covid mask wearing does not cause the flying public to suddenly lose control and behave violently. Must be some other reason. I wonder what it might be...
Reprinted From NewYorkTimes article 5/10/2021...
Cases of Unruly Airline Passengers Are Soaring, and So Are Federal Fines
By Neil Vigdor
The Federal Aviation Administration said it had fielded 1,300 complaints of unruly passengers since February, the same number of enforcement actions it took against passengers in the past decade.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times
Dozens of people face fines of up to $35,000 for assaulting and interfering with flight attendants under a zero-tolerance policy introduced by the F.A.A. this year.
May 10, 2021, 7:03 a.m. ETFour people are facing nearly $70,000 in civil fines for clashing with airline crews over mask requirements and other safety instructions on recent flights, part of what the Federal Aviation Administration called a “disturbing increase” in the number of unruly passengers who have returned to the skies with the easing of pandemic restrictions.
The latest round of proposed fines, which passengers have 30 days to contest, came just days after the F.A.A. said that it had received more than 1,300 unruly-passenger reports from airlines since February. In the previous decade, the agency said, it took enforcement actions against 1,300 passengers total.
“We will not tolerate interfering with a flight crew and the performance of their safety duties,” Stephen Dickson, the administrator of the F.A.A., said on Twitter on May 3. “Period.”
None of the passengers now facing fines were identified by the F.A.A., which this year imposed a zero-tolerance policy for interfering with or assaulting flight attendants that carries a fine of up to $35,000 and possible jail time.
One of the passengers, a woman who was traveling from the Dominican Republic on a JetBlue flight bound for New York on Feb. 7, refused to comply with instructions to wear a mask aboard the plane, hurled an empty liquor bottle that almost hit another passenger, threw food and shouted obscenities at flight attendants, according to the F.A.A.
The woman grabbed the arm of a flight attendant and hurt her arm, and she struck the arm of another flight attendant twice and scratched that crew member’s hand, causing the flight to return to the Dominican Republic, the F.A.A. said last week. It recommended a fine of $32,750 for the woman.
So far, the F.A.A. has identified potential violations in about 260 of the 1,300 cases referred by airlines, a spokesman for the agency said in an email on Sunday. Officials have begun enforcement actions in 20 of the cases and are preparing a number of additional enforcement actions, the spokesman said.
In 2019, before the coronavirus pandemic, there were 142 enforcement actions that stemmed from unruly passengers, according to the F.A.A. There were 159 in 2018, and 91 in 2017.
In an opinion column on Sunday on NBCNews.com, Sara Nelson, the president of the Association of Flight Attendants union, attributed the rising tensions in the skies to the politically charged atmosphere over health protocols. "What's causing these incidents?" she asked. Overwhelmingly, it's passengers who refuse to wear masks.
Ms. Nelson said that flight attendants would never tell passengers that it was a matter of personal choice to wear oxygen masks in the event of cabin depressurization or seatbelts in case of turbulence. The same is true now for wearing face masks to protect against the coronavirus.
“We’re also trained to help stop the spread of infectious disease,” she said. “We’re not just enforcing these long-overdue mask policies because we have to: We understand that masks are a way we keep ourselves and each other safe. And we’re grateful policymakers are backing us up.”
In April, the Transportation Security Administration extended a requirement for airline passengers to wear masks on commercial flights and at U.S. airports through Sept. 13. The order had been scheduled to expire on May 11.
Last month, Alaska Airlines said that it had suspended an Alaska state senator from its flights for violating its mask policies. The lawmaker, Lora Reinbold, a Republican, was captured on video arguing with employees at Juneau International Airport about the airline’s mask rules, according to footage posted on Twitter.
In response to the dispute, a woman who identified herself as an Alaska Airlines flight attendant said on Twitter that episodes like the one involving Ms. Reinbold were a reason that she had resigned.
“It has been an exhausting time for all the employees who are just trying to do their job according to their company’s policies,” the woman, Angela Hagedorn, said on April 26. “The constant arguing and pushback from guests, it’s ridiculous.”
As part of the latest round of fines recommended by the F.A.A., the agency said that a male passenger aboard a Southwest Airlines flight from Chicago to Sacramento on Jan. 26 refused to comply with a flight attendant’s instructions to wear a mask over his nose and mouth. The man became combative and used offensive language when a second flight attendant told him he was required to wear a mask, according to the F.A.A., which said that the passenger hit one of the flight attendants with his bags when he was ordered to leave the plane. Officials recommended a $16,500 fine for the man.
On Dec. 22, a Delta Air Lines flight from Minneapolis to Philadelphia returned to the airport after a female passenger began walking up and down the aisle during takeoff and refused to return to her seat, the F.A.A. said. A $9,000 fine was recommended for the woman, who the agency said told the crew repeatedly that she wanted to get off the plane.
A Jan. 30 flight from Bozeman, Mont., to Seattle also returned to the airport after a male passenger refused to put on a mask, according to the F.A.A., which also recommended a $9,000 fine in his case.
Cases of Unruly Airline Passengers Are Soaring, and So Are Federal Fines
By Neil Vigdor
The Federal Aviation Administration said it had fielded 1,300 complaints of unruly passengers since February, the same number of enforcement actions it took against passengers in the past decade.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times
Dozens of people face fines of up to $35,000 for assaulting and interfering with flight attendants under a zero-tolerance policy introduced by the F.A.A. this year.
May 10, 2021, 7:03 a.m. ETFour people are facing nearly $70,000 in civil fines for clashing with airline crews over mask requirements and other safety instructions on recent flights, part of what the Federal Aviation Administration called a “disturbing increase” in the number of unruly passengers who have returned to the skies with the easing of pandemic restrictions.
The latest round of proposed fines, which passengers have 30 days to contest, came just days after the F.A.A. said that it had received more than 1,300 unruly-passenger reports from airlines since February. In the previous decade, the agency said, it took enforcement actions against 1,300 passengers total.
“We will not tolerate interfering with a flight crew and the performance of their safety duties,” Stephen Dickson, the administrator of the F.A.A., said on Twitter on May 3. “Period.”
None of the passengers now facing fines were identified by the F.A.A., which this year imposed a zero-tolerance policy for interfering with or assaulting flight attendants that carries a fine of up to $35,000 and possible jail time.
One of the passengers, a woman who was traveling from the Dominican Republic on a JetBlue flight bound for New York on Feb. 7, refused to comply with instructions to wear a mask aboard the plane, hurled an empty liquor bottle that almost hit another passenger, threw food and shouted obscenities at flight attendants, according to the F.A.A.
The woman grabbed the arm of a flight attendant and hurt her arm, and she struck the arm of another flight attendant twice and scratched that crew member’s hand, causing the flight to return to the Dominican Republic, the F.A.A. said last week. It recommended a fine of $32,750 for the woman.
So far, the F.A.A. has identified potential violations in about 260 of the 1,300 cases referred by airlines, a spokesman for the agency said in an email on Sunday. Officials have begun enforcement actions in 20 of the cases and are preparing a number of additional enforcement actions, the spokesman said.
In 2019, before the coronavirus pandemic, there were 142 enforcement actions that stemmed from unruly passengers, according to the F.A.A. There were 159 in 2018, and 91 in 2017.
In an opinion column on Sunday on NBCNews.com, Sara Nelson, the president of the Association of Flight Attendants union, attributed the rising tensions in the skies to the politically charged atmosphere over health protocols. "What's causing these incidents?" she asked. Overwhelmingly, it's passengers who refuse to wear masks.
Ms. Nelson said that flight attendants would never tell passengers that it was a matter of personal choice to wear oxygen masks in the event of cabin depressurization or seatbelts in case of turbulence. The same is true now for wearing face masks to protect against the coronavirus.
“We’re also trained to help stop the spread of infectious disease,” she said. “We’re not just enforcing these long-overdue mask policies because we have to: We understand that masks are a way we keep ourselves and each other safe. And we’re grateful policymakers are backing us up.”
In April, the Transportation Security Administration extended a requirement for airline passengers to wear masks on commercial flights and at U.S. airports through Sept. 13. The order had been scheduled to expire on May 11.
Last month, Alaska Airlines said that it had suspended an Alaska state senator from its flights for violating its mask policies. The lawmaker, Lora Reinbold, a Republican, was captured on video arguing with employees at Juneau International Airport about the airline’s mask rules, according to footage posted on Twitter.
In response to the dispute, a woman who identified herself as an Alaska Airlines flight attendant said on Twitter that episodes like the one involving Ms. Reinbold were a reason that she had resigned.
“It has been an exhausting time for all the employees who are just trying to do their job according to their company’s policies,” the woman, Angela Hagedorn, said on April 26. “The constant arguing and pushback from guests, it’s ridiculous.”
As part of the latest round of fines recommended by the F.A.A., the agency said that a male passenger aboard a Southwest Airlines flight from Chicago to Sacramento on Jan. 26 refused to comply with a flight attendant’s instructions to wear a mask over his nose and mouth. The man became combative and used offensive language when a second flight attendant told him he was required to wear a mask, according to the F.A.A., which said that the passenger hit one of the flight attendants with his bags when he was ordered to leave the plane. Officials recommended a $16,500 fine for the man.
On Dec. 22, a Delta Air Lines flight from Minneapolis to Philadelphia returned to the airport after a female passenger began walking up and down the aisle during takeoff and refused to return to her seat, the F.A.A. said. A $9,000 fine was recommended for the woman, who the agency said told the crew repeatedly that she wanted to get off the plane.
A Jan. 30 flight from Bozeman, Mont., to Seattle also returned to the airport after a male passenger refused to put on a mask, according to the F.A.A., which also recommended a $9,000 fine in his case.
RSS Feed